Friday, February 27, 2009


(The Public Enemy, 1931)


Hi there!

I want to share a few interesting articles /trailers with you that have caught my attention in the last couple of days.

The first is an article about classic Depression era (1930s) Hollywood films: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2009/feb/25/depression-films-credit-crunch
This is interesting both for the wonderful films which are in the list (several of which you can find on YouTube if you're interested, or rent in places like the Puskin Mozi upstairs), and for the question of what will be the cinematic equivalents in our own time. What do you think? Are we already seeing films about the New Depression? What films are they? What are the current trends in film?

The second piece is also very interesting: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/feb/27/sexism-equality-hollywood
It's about sexism in cinema classics, and it evaluates some very well known classic films for how sexist they are. Can you think of some well known films which are particularly sexist (Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs springs to mind), or which give women strong leading roles (e.g. Stephen Daldry's The Hours)?

Speaking of Tarantino, here's a trailer for his latest effort: http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2009/feb/24/inglourious-basterds-tarantino-trailer
along with a brief review/evaluation of the trailer. What are your thoughts on Tarantino and his films?

Finally, here's a trailer for a much more serious film which looks very interesting: http://vimeo.com/2992103 I wonder if any of you saw An Inconvenient Truth, and if you did, what you thought of it. The comments here are interesting as well. This kind of cinema about current affairs and issues tends to provoke strong reactions. What are your feelings about films like this? What do you think about the issue of man-made global warming?

If you have any thoughts about any of these topics then please take a few minutes to share them with us.

Cheers,

Frank

Monday, February 23, 2009

hi
I would need a partner to do the presentation for this week...
so, if there is anyone who does not have a partner yet, please contact me:
andikaaa@msn.com
thx

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Vampire is the new Prince Charming





Vampires are the new hot stuff in Hollywood. True, they don’t get any awards, but the screaming fans and the incoming millions sure make it up for the lack.

But what is it exactly which makes these bloodsuckers so popular? Aren’t they supposed to be terrifying creatures making people scream and faint at their sight? Oh no, not in Hollywood. Movie-makers soon realized that the traditional image of vampires would just not do anymore. So what did they do? They began to cast gorgeous actors and actresses and essentially killed everything which makes a vampire a vampire.

The trend started somewhere around the appearance of Brad Pitt in The interview with the vampire in 1994. His character, Louis, was passionate and caring and had such a sad life story that people couldn’t help but love him. And this is the thing in these movies: apart from their diet, these vampires are so human that the whole idea of being horrified of the just simply vanished.

Then came Gerard Butler in Dracula 2000. His portrayal of the count was quite different from Bela Lugosi’s back in 1931. This vampire was handsome and made all the girls swoon. Yeah, not your average pale-white and red-eyed monster either.

Yet the biggest blasphemy – at least according to diehard vampire fans – came with Twilight and the dazzling Edward Cullen. No fangs, no burning in the sunlight and no hunting for humans. Instead he looks like a normal boy - well, apart from the fact that he sparkles in the sunlight - and hunts for animals. Not the traditional vampire either.

And where does this whole trend lead? To insanity of course, just as the producers want it, with tons of girls going and watching the same movie ten times and buying everything which is related to their favourite bloodsucker. And not just girls, unfortunately adults have been going crazy as well. (Have you ever heard about Twilight-moms? If not then get on your knees and thank God, if yes, then you know how hard it is to reach the toilet before your breakfast makes an appearance...)

Spoiling the vampires and making them fancy men is certainly embarassing for the whole mythical world but at least Hollywood gets its money and fans can lay in their bed at night, wishing a vampire would jump in through their windows and bit them. Or if their much awaited creature doesn’t show up, they can still go to their dentists to get fangs and use the Cullen Body Glitter to sparkle in the sun.



And here's a video, just so you can see that fans would do anything - even if it means total embarassment (although I think they don't even think that what they're doing is totally pitiful...)


Wednesday, February 18, 2009

"I'm gonna use mine as a toilet roll holder"


Hi folks!
As Whisper mentions below, it's the Oscars this Sunday and I've come across a few things which you might find interesting.
The first one is about weird Oscar presentation speeches and has lots of You Tube links. One word of advice though, make sure you click on the titles and not on the pictures. If you click on the pictures it'll only take you to another page and not to the video.
The other pieces are a funky interactive guide to bizarre Oscar facts:
and a related article by the film historian who put the guide together explains how he researched the facts:
If you've got some time to kill, check these out - they're good fun and you'll be working on your English at the same time.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

The Happening - A look at the Razzies

While scouring the Net and meandering through the various nominees for the Oscars this February, I happened to come across the list of candidates for the less-than-prestigious Razzies. As per usual with a frequent torrent-(ab)user like yours truly, I often downloaded the newest axxo-releases if they garnered enough seeders. Can you start to see the connection here? Yeah, so I managed to get hold of some movies that would likely join the other C- action flicks and lame teenage comedies you would usually find in the 1.99$ bin of the local gas station. By now I've learned to preselect my download choices more meticulously, with movies it's not always the best technique not to judge the book/movie by its cover (as in title). Coming back to the nominees, I totally agree with Disaster movie (very fitting decorum for a wonderfully nauseating waste of 90 minutes) being there; the sheer mention of Mr. Hilton's devilishly ugly pampered daughter as an "actress" in a movie that isn't xxx-rated warned me ante bellum to keep as far away from The Hottie and the Nottie as I possibly could (which reminds me, how in the hell is this white trash-hopeful ugliest-of-all-ducklings one-woman all-you-can-eat brothel be elected as one of the most beautiful people in the world? People, please, where are your eyes? Do you know how to friggin' use them at all?) I know absolutely nothing about a flick called In the Name of the King (unless Jessica Biel, Eva Longoria or someone of this magnitude has even a small cameo in it - which I honestly doubt - I won't bother to see it). As for the Love Guru, well.. I've seen worse (ruminations of an overhyped and seriously overrated Golden Compass come to mind), at least it was partly enjoyable, I'm not a big fan of Mike Myers' antics. But it had enough scenes with Jessica Alba and someone named Meagan Good in it, so I got a fair deal out of it (no, I don't like Jessica Simpson, and never will, she is NOT that beautiful, trust me on that).
Now, the last one on the top-five I was a bit bothered by. A movie that offered a horrifyingly thrilling concept, which was duly ruined to pieces by a totally uninspired, dry and salty cast: The Happening, Shyamalan's latest journey into the deep thriller genre. The storyboard looked great: a mysterious substance is submitted into the biosphere, spreading via thin air, eliminating the human instinct for survival and self-preservation, culminating in the individual's lust for suicide. Sounds terrifying, doesn't it? It is, and the first 2-3 minutes of the movie really awed me and kept me glued to the screen - after those first few minutes, I had to pause the movie and catch myself. Why? Because you don't always need a good-sounding monologue delivered by James Earl Jones (notwithstanding, I'm still a fan of his) to create the atmosphere of a changed world. You just take two women sitting on a park bench in Central Park, a sudden absence of ambient sound and a totally unexpected, grisly insertion of a knitting-pin in her neck artery - no, not one of your Sunday serial killers roaming the park premises, she done it upon herself, as you might say. Next scene: construction site. Men in hard hats snickering in a huddled group. A body falls into some debris near them, one of the other workers. Total bedlam engulfs his colleagues, and another body falls behind them. I always loved that one point in a movie when you have a character actor you would never recognize in any other film, regardless of their name or the size of their paycheck, manage a facial expression that just sticks in your mind for ever and ever (worthy mentions: prison guard on bus in Con Air after seeing the tape recorder fall from inside pocket of mistaken paroler; freshly slaughtered Navy seal hanging upside down through the manhole in the washroom after the shootout scene in The Rock; some of the more talented extras in catastrophe movies who are told to look awestruck when seeing the alien spacecraft/creature/tidal wave/uncommon sight) - in this movie, this was one of the construction workers, who after hearing the third or fourth body fall from the sky, looks up and sees more and more of his colleagues simply walk off the ledge many floors higher. I would greatly recommend getting this movie just for that first 2-3 minutes of film.
Why only that? Well, the concept of the movie might be great, but the casting people must have had a bad day, collecting around them an ensemble cast whose only purpose is to ruin the movie from that point forward. Marky Mark Wahlberg is seriously trying to lose his "good vibrations" fame, but he does nothing more than oversell the panicked scientist guy, making his role worthless. Enrolling John Leguizamo as another profit-puller didn't work out, he turned out to portray a character who does something (or in the plural) completely unnatural - who would leave their young daughter behind to enter a disease-ridden area and search for an estranged wife, especially if he hasn't the faintest idea as to her location? At least he exited nicely, that death scene was nicely played out, especially with them going through the haunted town - now there was another scene that could have been done a lot better, if they wouldn't have played out the archetypical Hollywood portrayal of the horrified young white woman who screams her head off when seeing a dead body. Seriously, what is it with those roles? You would think that in today's world, with all the hype on women also being tough, independent and kickass, there goes some typical white-collar single lady and ruins it all (sorry, not meant to be sexist, but I hate female roles whose sole intention is to permanently damage my eardrums with their high-pitched sirens when they see a drop of blood, just not damn realistic). Anyway, in that scene there were three people, plus one Leguizamo and one Banshee riding in the car, and you cut to a still with them looking out the side window, showing abandoned vehicles and road repair trucks, and a curiously large amount of ladders around, all propped up. The camera pans lower, and you see a long line of people hung on the branches of trees, obviously also victims of the toxin they breathed in. Very alarming scene, cinematically great portrayal, but that screaming b*tch spoiled it for me - you can't enjoy a nicely played out mass suicide scene whilst scrambling for the volume dial.
Okay, another thing that bugged me, the female lead. Why, why, why, oh why do you always have to have a romantic relationship in a catastrophe movie, thriller, action, horror, or any of the like? I know love is all around, but I can't see myself scrambling to ask out that girl leaking blood from her forearm when Godzilla is chasing after me. How to make a corny scary movie 101: take 5-6 people who don't know each other, with an equal ratio of male and female, and by the 76th minute, have each one fornicate with at least two others. Even better if you have two of the girls do each other, and you'll be a class A success if the killer knocks in one of the pairs while they are rolling around under the covers, even though their best friend was killed in the last scene. It worked in slasher cult classics like Scream and I know what you did last summer, but it's not a golden rule, it doesn't have to be followed in every and each film. So, even though The Happening peaked in its first few minutes, and was lost with a badly scripted leadthrough to the last half hour (although I have to agree that killing off those two juniors by the weird farmhouse patrons was quite unexpected and in my humble opinion a bit too extreme in movie standards), it totally killed the viewing pleasure when Marky Mark and that actress (whose name I won't even bother to look up) tried to connect with each other sentimentally. The end of the movie was a bit lame that way, bringing in the old hermit lady who hated everyone else (gosh, I wonder why she offered room and board for some strangers if she was a misanthrope?) dug the movie deeper than it was buried at this point. I'm also a fan of a good cliffhanger-like short scene before or after the final credits, but this one with the virus spreading over to France was totally random, and I didn't get caught on. If I had to grade it, I would give an A for original idea, C- for sidetracking the main storyline, D-- for cast, B+ for effects and visual. I've only watched The Sixth Sense a few years ago, and don't recall any other Shyamalan movies I might have seen (although I have Lady in the water downloaded somewhere), but I do hope that he'll keep coming up with good main ideas, and please, stick to that, don't sidetrack to make the movie more popular - and if possible, don't assign leading-man hopefuls this much, especially with someone as typecast as Wahlberg or completely indifferent to this genre as Leguizamo. The best of luck at the Razzies.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Mr. Prescott, I'm just wondering, can we publish our own reviews here? I have one, but it.. um.. contains bad language, so to say, but not too much. Should I censor it a bit or just post the entire thing? Thanks in advance

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Hi everyone! Is this the palace of arts of enlightened minds? We'll see :)

Friday, February 6, 2009



































Welcome to the palace of lights!

Hopefully, this will be the forum where we can discuss our favourite films and directors and talk about the course as it proceeds. I will also be posting updates for you on tasks and presentations and reminders of what needs to be done for the next class.

The pictures above are of three of my favourite cinemas. I wonder if you recognise any of them.

Do you have a favourite cinema which means something special to you?